<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Courtroom Insight Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.courtroominsight.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.courtroominsight.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 16:35:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='blog.courtroominsight.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://blog.courtroominsight.com/osd.xml" title="The Courtroom Insight Blog" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://blog.courtroominsight.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>Biased Expert Witnesses: Apple-Samsung Patent Trial</title>
		<link>http://blog.courtroominsight.com/2012/05/24/biased-expert-witnesses-apple-samsung-patent-trial/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.courtroominsight.com/2012/05/24/biased-expert-witnesses-apple-samsung-patent-trial/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 16:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daniellebogaards</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Courtroom Insight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry Insights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[expert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[expert witness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.courtroominsight.com/?p=1120</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Expert witnesses play a key role in providing the court with a platform to better comprehend information. To do so, experts must remain unbiased and not rely solely on what attorneys say, rather they should take all given information to draw their own conclusions. In the Apple-Samsung patent trial, Samsung has filed court documents asking [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=blog.courtroominsight.com&#038;blog=10242335&#038;post=1120&#038;subd=courtroominsight&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.courtroominsight.com/2012/05/24/biased-expert-witnesses-apple-samsung-patent-trial/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/b7d82c44ce1808a08d5af6555bbf0544?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F1.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">daniellebogaards</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google v. Oracle or Alsup v. Boies?</title>
		<link>http://blog.courtroominsight.com/2012/05/17/google-v-oracle-or-alsup-v-boies/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.courtroominsight.com/2012/05/17/google-v-oracle-or-alsup-v-boies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 00:39:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daniellebogaards</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Industry Insights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oracle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trial]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.courtroominsight.com/?p=1117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As promised, we are tracking the Google v. Oracle trial with some excitement! U.S. District Judge William Alsup was not only a litigator before sitting on the bench, but is also knowledgeable in technology and has been engaging with highly technical questioning of computer programers throughout the trial. To back up his understanding of technology, [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=blog.courtroominsight.com&#038;blog=10242335&#038;post=1117&#038;subd=courtroominsight&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.courtroominsight.com/2012/05/17/google-v-oracle-or-alsup-v-boies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/b7d82c44ce1808a08d5af6555bbf0544?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F1.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">daniellebogaards</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Verdicts for Google v. Oracle Trial, Phase 1</title>
		<link>http://blog.courtroominsight.com/2012/05/10/verdicts-for-google-v-oracle-trial-phase-1/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.courtroominsight.com/2012/05/10/verdicts-for-google-v-oracle-trial-phase-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 01:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daniellebogaards</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Industry Insights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oracle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[verdict]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.courtroominsight.com/?p=1115</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to reporter Ginny LaRoe, who has been following the Google v. Oracle case in court these past few weeks, the verdict of the trial&#8217;s first phase plays to both sides. Neither Google nor Oracle reign victorious, but each win parts of the battle. The jury trial disputing copyright infringement for smartphones is conducted in [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=blog.courtroominsight.com&#038;blog=10242335&#038;post=1115&#038;subd=courtroominsight&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.courtroominsight.com/2012/05/10/verdicts-for-google-v-oracle-trial-phase-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/b7d82c44ce1808a08d5af6555bbf0544?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F1.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">daniellebogaards</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Breakdown of the Texas Planned Parenthood Funding Dispute</title>
		<link>http://blog.courtroominsight.com/2012/05/02/breakdown-of-the-texas-planned-parenthood-funding-dispute/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.courtroominsight.com/2012/05/02/breakdown-of-the-texas-planned-parenthood-funding-dispute/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 22:52:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daniellebogaards</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cases in Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Courtroom Insight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Directory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[planned parenthood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[texas judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trial]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.courtroominsight.com/?p=1111</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The debate involving whether Texas Womens Health Program participant, Planned Parenthood, should be banned by the state appears to be an uphill battle. Federal appeals judge of the Fifth Circuit Appeals, Judge Jerry Smith, lifted the order granted by an Austin federal judge just 24 hours earlier. &#8220;We are disappointed in the stay granted last [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=blog.courtroominsight.com&#038;blog=10242335&#038;post=1111&#038;subd=courtroominsight&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.courtroominsight.com/2012/05/02/breakdown-of-the-texas-planned-parenthood-funding-dispute/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/b7d82c44ce1808a08d5af6555bbf0544?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F1.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">daniellebogaards</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Red Flags&#8221; to Look for in Expert Witnesses</title>
		<link>http://blog.courtroominsight.com/2012/04/26/red-flags-for-watch-for-in-expert-witnesses/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.courtroominsight.com/2012/04/26/red-flags-for-watch-for-in-expert-witnesses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 23:32:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daniellebogaards</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Industry Insights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Courtroom Insight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Expert Witness Directory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Expert Witnesses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judicial management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal ability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Referral Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.courtroominsight.com/?p=1103</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Expert witnesses exist in the courtroom as valuable resources of knowledge, and with such expertise may alter the verdict of a given case if the expert witness is persuasive, or not persuasive enough. As proof, the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals described what it called the &#8220;red flags&#8221; a trial judge should look for [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=blog.courtroominsight.com&#038;blog=10242335&#038;post=1103&#038;subd=courtroominsight&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.courtroominsight.com/2012/04/26/red-flags-for-watch-for-in-expert-witnesses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/b7d82c44ce1808a08d5af6555bbf0544?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F1.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">daniellebogaards</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rising Status of Forensic Handwriting Expert Beth Chrisman</title>
		<link>http://blog.courtroominsight.com/2012/04/17/rising-status-of-forensic-handwriting-expert-beth-chrisman/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.courtroominsight.com/2012/04/17/rising-status-of-forensic-handwriting-expert-beth-chrisman/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 16:40:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daniellebogaards</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviews of Experts and Consultants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beth Chrisman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Courtroom Insight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Expert Witness Directory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Expert Witnesses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry Insights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal ability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Profiles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.courtroominsight.com/?p=1095</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Forensic document examiner Beth Chrisman has appeared in court, both on and off the television set. For the past two years she has appeared on the courtroom television shows Swift Justice with Nancy Grace, Judge Karen, Swift Justice with Jackie Glass, as well as consulted on Judge Joe Brown&#8217;s staff. Her fame picked up after [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=blog.courtroominsight.com&#038;blog=10242335&#038;post=1095&#038;subd=courtroominsight&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.courtroominsight.com/2012/04/17/rising-status-of-forensic-handwriting-expert-beth-chrisman/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/b7d82c44ce1808a08d5af6555bbf0544?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F1.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">daniellebogaards</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Federal Court To Decide On Graphic Cigarette Labels</title>
		<link>http://blog.courtroominsight.com/2012/04/12/federal-court-to-decide-graphic-cigarette-labels/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.courtroominsight.com/2012/04/12/federal-court-to-decide-graphic-cigarette-labels/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 15:50:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daniellebogaards</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cases in Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry Insights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cigarette]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Directory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tobacco]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.courtroominsight.com/?p=1084</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Tuesday, the Federal Appeals Court in Washington DC heard the case between the lawyers of tobacco companies versus the government to decide if cigarette cartons should contain graphic warning labels with images of diseased lungs or sewn up torsos. In 2009 Congress gave the FDA the authority to regulate tobacco, after the FDA proposed [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=blog.courtroominsight.com&#038;blog=10242335&#038;post=1084&#038;subd=courtroominsight&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.courtroominsight.com/2012/04/12/federal-court-to-decide-graphic-cigarette-labels/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/b7d82c44ce1808a08d5af6555bbf0544?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F1.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">daniellebogaards</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trayvon Martin Case: 2 Forensic Voice Experts Weight In On 911 Call</title>
		<link>http://blog.courtroominsight.com/2012/04/10/trayvon-martin-case-2-forensic-voice-experts-weight-in-on-911-call/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.courtroominsight.com/2012/04/10/trayvon-martin-case-2-forensic-voice-experts-weight-in-on-911-call/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 16:17:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daniellebogaards</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured Expert Witnesses, Mediators and Arbitrators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Courtroom Insight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[expert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Expert Witnesses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[witness]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.courtroominsight.com/?p=1077</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Trayvon Martin case is gaining national attention. The case concerns the Feb. 26 killing of an African American teenager by a neighborhood watch volunteer, George Zimmerman, in Sanford, Florida. The defense&#8217;s strategy is to argue Zimmerman acted in self-defense under the &#8220;Stand Your Ground Law.&#8221; Two forensic voice identification experts weigh in on the [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=blog.courtroominsight.com&#038;blog=10242335&#038;post=1077&#038;subd=courtroominsight&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.courtroominsight.com/2012/04/10/trayvon-martin-case-2-forensic-voice-experts-weight-in-on-911-call/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/b7d82c44ce1808a08d5af6555bbf0544?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F1.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">daniellebogaards</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Embattled Expert Witness Prevented from Joining Case Against Morgan Keegan</title>
		<link>http://blog.courtroominsight.com/2012/03/28/embattled-expert-witness-prevented-from-joining-case-against-morgan-keegan/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.courtroominsight.com/2012/03/28/embattled-expert-witness-prevented-from-joining-case-against-morgan-keegan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 17:14:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kristen Botill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Industry Insights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brokerage Firms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Craig McCann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Expert Witness Directory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Expert Witnesses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Directory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securites Firms]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.courtroominsight.com/?p=1069</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#8217;ve previously told you about the troubles prominent expert witness Craig McCann has faced against brokerage firm Morgan Keegan.  As a reminder, in September a federal judge ruled that McCann gave a fraudulent testimony against the firm.  Well, late last week a district court judge ruled that McCann will not be allowed to become a [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=blog.courtroominsight.com&#038;blog=10242335&#038;post=1069&#038;subd=courtroominsight&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.courtroominsight.com/2012/03/28/embattled-expert-witness-prevented-from-joining-case-against-morgan-keegan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/923eb0d96ebf9fd74ecbfa0639742b69?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F1.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">kbotill</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Settlement Reached in Madoff Victims v. Mets Owners</title>
		<link>http://blog.courtroominsight.com/2012/03/23/settlement-reached-in-madoff-victims-v-mets-owners/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.courtroominsight.com/2012/03/23/settlement-reached-in-madoff-victims-v-mets-owners/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2012 16:28:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kristen Botill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Industry Insights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Expert Witnesses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Madoff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mets]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.courtroominsight.com/?p=1060</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#8217;ve kept you updated on the drama surrounding the expert witnesses in the Madoff trustee&#8217;s case against the New York Mets&#8217; owners.  It appears the sideshow that saw three experts tossed from the trial over inadequate qualifications has come to a close.  The owners of the NY Mets have settled with the Madoff victims&#8217; court-appointed trustee [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=blog.courtroominsight.com&#038;blog=10242335&#038;post=1060&#038;subd=courtroominsight&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.courtroominsight.com/2012/03/23/settlement-reached-in-madoff-victims-v-mets-owners/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/923eb0d96ebf9fd74ecbfa0639742b69?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F1.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">kbotill</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
